SEPTEMBER 9, 1976
Today the death of Comrade Mao Tsetung was reported. His death saddens and worries us, especially in this disturbed situation. It is a great loss for China.
In my opinion, Mao Tsetung was a revolutionary, a personality of importance, not only for China but on an international level.
Mao Tsetung led the Communist Party and the great Chinese people to the major victory of the liberation of China from enslavement by occupiers and from the reactionary clique of the Kuomintang. This was an achievement of great historic importance, both for the Chinese people and for the socialist camp and the peoples who fought and are fighting for liberation.
Under the leadership of Mao, the construction of socialism began in China. (At least, this was our belief up till recently, when we are seeing that this «construction» has gone with zigzags.) In our opinion, matters have already reached the point when the question must be asked: Which will triumph in China, socialism or capitalism? Therefore the death of Comrade Mao Tsetung gives rise to great concern amongst us about the future of the Chinese people and the course China will follow after his death. Of course, we can make no pronouncements on this at present, time will make this clear to us. May we be proven wrong, but the result of this line, which the Chinese revisionists call «Mao Tsetung thought» and which has nothing in common with Marxism-Leninism, will spell nothing good for China.
Mao Tsetung, as a thinker and philosopher, as a revolutionary democrat leader of the Chinese people, is an historical personality, but history and Marxist-Leninist analysis of the situation in China will explain that while he was a philosopher with a broad culture, he was not a Marxist-Leninist. He was profoundly influenced by the old Chinese philosophy of Confucius, etc., and as the eclectic he was, he brought Marxism-Leninism into his work only in the form of mutilated principles and ideas.
It was precisely his philosophical eclecticism which made Mao what one may call a moderator for the different currents which have existed continuously in China, which he permitted, encouraged and put in allegedly dialectical «collision». However, the activity of a moderator might influence for good or for evil, but in any case such a thing could operate only so long as Mao himself was alive. Now he is dead. Will China remain red, and this red be turned into a true, fiery, revolutionary, Marxist-Leninist red?
This is what we desire and hope for with all our heart and soul, with all our communist sincerity, because this is for the good of China, the revolution, socialism and communism. We Albanian communists will remember Mao Tsetung with respect for his good aspects, for those positive ideas and his long revolutionary activity, but in regard to those political, ideological and organizational views and stands which we consider to have been mistaken and non-Marxist, we have not sat and will not sit idle without pointing them out and criticizing them. Leninism teaches us that we must always be correct and objective and not subjective or sentimental.
Regardless of our disagreement with many of his judgements, the death of Comrade Mao Tsetung saddens us also, because he always showed himself to be a friend and admirer of our socialist country and the Party of Labour of Albania and, as the communists and internationalists we are, we must not ignore this. We can say that Mao Tsetung was the main and decisive person in the Chinese leadership who assisted the People’s Republic of Albania with economic and military credits and he accorded this aid in an internationalist spirit. In the same spirit, our Party assisted China, stood beside it and defended Mao in both good and difficult times, especially against the attacks of the Khrushchevite revisionists, as well as during the Great Cultural Revolution.
Immediately we heard about his death, we decided to send a Party and Government delegation with Comrade Mehmet at the head, but in the statement which the Chinese leadership released we read that foreign delegations would not be welcome to take part in the ceremonies organized on this occasion.
Naturally, we took measures to send messages of condolence and see that wreaths were laid in Peking, to organize visits and send messages of condolence to the Chinese embassy in Tirana from the leadership of the Party, the state, the mass organizations, the educational, cultural and scientific institutions, as well as delegations from the working collectives of Tirana and a number of industrial enterprises and agricultural cooperatives of other districts.
2 thoughts on ““Mao Tsetung Has Died” by Enver Hoxha”
Hope Maoists read this.
i consider myself a maoist ( i dont shoot police officers but sympathize with those that do so maybe i am a mere “fantacisist”) and i find most of uncle enver’s criticism’s correct. i dont think however we can discount maoist accomplishments even in the age of Deng’s revisionism. i mean why should i care if subcommandante marcos refuses to side with a particular communist camp or why should i criticize the chinese revisionists for supplying the naxalites with food and weapons? after all hoxha followed mao’s marxist policies in some ways, such as the abolishment of formal military rank (i am from rural oklahoma and actually know an albanian officer who was “commisioned” in 1987 and enlightened me to albanian history), and both hoxha and mao proclaimed they made mistakes as did stalin, lenin, engels, marx, etc. and while i am admittedly ignorant of albanian 20th century history i would find no fault with enver hoxha if he used the memory of skandenberg to rally albanian communists and nationalists to oppose the italian fascist invaders or even the revisionist forces of Josip Broz, so long as marxism was acknowlegded as the dominant ideological force, and i cant imagine a partisan of world war 2 not prepared to support communism. even the great stalin allied with trostkyites to eliminate the bukharinite rightists preparing to sell out the USSR to imperialist capitalism. i guess what im attempting to say is coalition politics has its place even in a bolshevik revolution